Vulnerable Customers: What the FCA Expects and Who Is Accountable
Few areas of conduct regulation get as much attention from the FCA as the treatment of vulnerable customers. The regulator’s guidance sets out what it expects, the Consumer Duty has raised the bar on evidencing good outcomes, and supervisors increasingly ask boards to show how they know vulnerable customers are being treated fairly. This guide explains what “vulnerable customer” means, what firms must do in practice, how the Consumer Duty fits in, and which Senior Managers are accountable for getting it right.
What Is a Vulnerable Customer?
The FCA defines a vulnerable customer as someone who, due to their personal circumstances, is especially susceptible to harm, particularly when a firm is not acting with appropriate levels of care. Two points in that definition matter. First, vulnerability is about circumstances, not a fixed label: anyone can become vulnerable, and many people move in and out of vulnerability over time. Second, the definition links vulnerability to the firm’s own conduct. The question isn’t only whether a customer is vulnerable, but whether the firm’s products, processes and people respond to that vulnerability with the care it needs.
The FCA’s own research has consistently found that a large share of UK adults show one or more characteristics of vulnerability at any given time. For most retail firms, vulnerable customers are not a small edge case; they are a significant part of the customer base.
The Four Drivers of Vulnerability
The FCA groups the characteristics associated with vulnerability into four drivers. Firms are expected to understand how each applies to their own customers.
| Driver | What it covers | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Health | Conditions or illnesses that affect a person’s ability to carry out day-to-day tasks | Physical disability, long-term illness, mental health conditions, cognitive impairment |
| Life events | Major changes in circumstances | Bereavement, job loss, relationship breakdown, becoming a carer, retirement |
| Resilience | Low ability to withstand financial or emotional shocks | Low or erratic income, over-indebtedness, low savings |
| Capability | Low knowledge of financial matters or low confidence in managing money | Low literacy or numeracy, poor digital skills, language barriers |
Characteristics often overlap. A customer facing a bereavement may also have reduced resilience and temporarily lower capability. Firms that treat vulnerability as a single tick-box category tend to miss those combinations.
FG21/1: The FCA’s Guidance on Vulnerable Customers
In 2021 the FCA published finalised guidance, FG21/1 on the fair treatment of vulnerable customers. It explains what the FCA expects firms to do to comply with the Principles for Businesses in relation to vulnerable customers. The guidance is organised around four areas:
- Understanding customers’ needs. Firms should understand the nature and scale of vulnerability in their target market and customer base, and the impact it could have on customers’ needs and experiences.
- Skills and capability of staff. Staff should have the skills and capability to recognise and respond to vulnerability, and to do so with appropriate care.
- Taking practical action. Firms should design products and services, customer service and communications so that they meet the needs of vulnerable customers.
- Monitoring and evaluation. Firms should monitor whether they are meeting vulnerable customers’ needs, and act where they are not.
The guidance makes clear that the aim is for vulnerable customers to experience outcomes as good as those of other customers. It is not about treating vulnerable customers less favourably or excluding them; it is about making sure the firm’s ordinary processes don’t fail them.
How the Consumer Duty Changes the Picture
The Consumer Duty, which applied to open products from July 2023 and closed products from July 2024, builds on FG21/1 and makes vulnerability part of the firm’s core obligations to retail customers. The Duty requires firms to deliver good outcomes for all retail customers, including those with characteristics of vulnerability, across its four outcomes: products and services, price and value, consumer understanding and consumer support. Our guide to the Consumer Duty for Senior Managers explains the outcomes in detail, and the FCA’s Consumer Duty pages set out the rules.
In practice, the Duty has raised the bar in three ways:
- Evidence of outcomes. Firms must monitor and evidence outcomes for different groups of customers, including vulnerable customers, rather than relying on having a vulnerability policy.
- Board reporting. The board must review an annual assessment of whether the firm is delivering good outcomes, which should cover vulnerable customers specifically.
- Consumer understanding and support. Communications and support must work for customers with different needs, for example people with low financial capability or those in financial difficulty.
The FCA has continued to review how firms treat vulnerable customers since the Duty came in, and has published findings on good and poor practice. Firms should check the regulator’s latest publications, as its expectations on areas such as recording vulnerability data and measuring outcomes have continued to develop.
What Firms Need to Do in Practice
Turning the guidance into practice usually involves the following elements. The scale and sophistication should reflect the firm’s size, customer base and the harm its products could cause.
- Understand the customer base. Use data, research and frontline insight to understand how common each driver of vulnerability is among your customers, and how your products and processes could affect them.
- Train and support staff. Frontline staff need practical training to recognise signs of vulnerability and respond appropriately, with clear routes to specialist support. Staff wellbeing matters too, because difficult conversations take a toll.
- Design with vulnerability in mind. Product design, eligibility, charges, exit routes and processes should be tested for how they work for customers with characteristics of vulnerability.
- Make communications work. Use plain language, offer a range of channels, and adapt communications for customers who need them, for example larger print, phone contact or a trusted third party.
- Record needs appropriately. Where customers share information about their circumstances, record it so they don’t have to repeat it, with appropriate data protection safeguards.
- Monitor outcomes. Use management information to compare outcomes for vulnerable customers with others: complaints, arrears, cancellations, claims, call handling and so on.
- Act on what the data shows. Where outcomes are worse, change the product, process or communication, and record what was done.
Recording information about health and other personal circumstances raises data protection considerations, as some of it is likely to be special category data under UK GDPR. Firms should take advice on the lawful basis for recording it and on how it is used and shared.
Vulnerability by Sector
| Sector | Where vulnerability shows up most |
|---|---|
| Debt collection and debt purchase | Customers in financial difficulty, forbearance, affordable repayment plans, mental health and debt, referral to debt advice |
| Consumer credit and lending | Affordability, arrears handling, borrowers in persistent debt, motor finance and high-cost credit |
| Insurance | Claims handling after bereavement or illness, renewal pricing, product exclusions, access for disabled customers |
| Wealth and financial advice | Older clients, cognitive decline, powers of attorney, retirement decisions, ongoing advice charges |
| Payments and e-money | Fraud and scams, including authorised push payment fraud, account access, digital exclusion |
| Banking | Basic bank accounts, financial abuse, bereavement processes, branch and service changes |
Sector experience matters when firms recruit compliance and conduct leaders, because the vulnerability issues in debt collection are very different from those in wealth management. Our pages on SMF recruitment for consumer credit firms and SMF recruitment in Leeds, where debt and credit firms are concentrated, cover this in more detail.
Governance and Accountability
Treating vulnerable customers fairly is a board-level responsibility, and under the SMCR it sits with named Senior Managers.
The board
The board sets the firm’s approach, reviews management information on vulnerable customer outcomes and, under the Consumer Duty, approves the annual assessment of outcomes. Boards should be able to answer simple questions: how many customers show characteristics of vulnerability, how their outcomes compare with others, and what the firm has changed as a result.
The Consumer Duty board champion
Most firms have appointed a board champion, usually a non-executive, to help the board challenge whether the Duty, including its vulnerability elements, is embedded. See our guide to the Consumer Duty board champion.
Senior Managers
Accountability for the Consumer Duty is often allocated to a specific Senior Manager, and the approach to vulnerable customers usually sits with that person, with operational ownership in the business areas that serve customers. Our guide to Consumer Duty and the SMF framework explains how firms allocate it. All Senior Managers are subject to the Duty of Responsibility in their areas, and staff are subject to the Consumer Duty Conduct Rule to act to deliver good outcomes for retail customers.
The compliance officer
The compliance officer, usually SMF16, provides second-line oversight: testing whether vulnerability policies work in practice through the compliance monitoring plan, reviewing outcomes data, challenging the business where outcomes for vulnerable customers are worse, and reporting to the board. In retail firms, vulnerability is now one of the main areas a compliance officer is judged on.
Scenario: A consumer credit firm has a vulnerability policy, a training module and a flag on its customer system. Its Consumer Duty board report says vulnerable customers are treated fairly. When the compliance officer tests the data, she finds that customers flagged as vulnerable are more likely to be in long-term arrears and less likely to be offered a sustainable repayment plan than other customers. Call reviews show frontline staff recognise vulnerability but have no clear options to offer. The firm redesigns its forbearance options, gives frontline teams authority to agree tailored plans, adds a specialist support team and starts reporting comparative outcomes to the board every quarter.
Common Failings
- a vulnerability policy that exists on paper but isn’t reflected in products, processes or scripts
- training that teaches staff to spot vulnerability but not what to do next
- recording vulnerability inconsistently, so customers have to repeat painful information
- no management information comparing outcomes for vulnerable customers with others
- board reports that describe activity rather than outcomes
- products designed for the “average” customer, with charges, exclusions or processes that hit vulnerable customers hardest
- digital-only journeys with no accessible alternative
- no clear owner at Senior Manager level
Hiring People With Vulnerability Experience
For retail firms, experience of vulnerable customers is now one of the most important things to test when hiring a compliance officer, head of conduct or customer outcomes lead. Good candidates can describe how they measured outcomes for vulnerable customers, what the data showed, and what changed as a result. They understand the firm’s sector-specific issues, from forbearance in collections to cognitive decline in wealth management, and they can explain vulnerability to a board in terms of evidence rather than intentions.
When we recruit for these roles, we ask candidates for specific examples: a product or process they changed because of vulnerable customer outcomes, a board report they wrote, a difficult case they handled. Our guide to the compliance officer experience that matters by firm type covers this further, and our page on compliance officer recruitment explains how we run the search. For definitions of the terms used in this guide, see our SMCR glossary.
Conduct and Compliance Recruitment
People who deliver good outcomes for every customer. Every SMF search is led personally by Adrian Lawrence FCA
Compliance Officer
Conduct oversight for retail firms.
→ SMF16 recruitment → Part-time compliance officerCompliance monitoring plan →
Consumer Duty
Accountability for outcomes.
→ Consumer Duty guide → The board championWhere accountability sits →
Sectors
Where vulnerability matters most.
→ Consumer credit → InsuranceWealth and advice →
Combined Role
Compliance officer and MLRO.
→ Joint SMF16 and SMF17 → Interim coverSMCR glossary →
Every SMF search is led personally by Adrian Lawrence FCA
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the FCA’s definition of a vulnerable customer?
Someone who, due to their personal circumstances, is especially susceptible to harm, particularly when a firm is not acting with appropriate levels of care.
What are the four drivers of vulnerability?
Health, life events, resilience and capability. Customers can show characteristics of more than one at the same time, and vulnerability can be temporary or long-term.
Is FG21/1 still relevant now the Consumer Duty applies?
Yes. FG21/1 remains the FCA’s guidance on the fair treatment of vulnerable customers, and the Consumer Duty builds on it by requiring firms to evidence good outcomes for all retail customers, including vulnerable customers.
Which Senior Manager is responsible for vulnerable customers?
Usually the Senior Manager allocated responsibility for the Consumer Duty, with second-line oversight from the compliance officer and challenge from the board and its Consumer Duty champion.
Does vulnerability only matter for retail firms?
The Consumer Duty applies to retail customers, so the main obligations sit with firms whose products and services reach consumers, directly or through distribution chains.
About the Author
Adrian Lawrence FCA is the founder of SMF Capital. He is a Chartered Accountant and Fellow of the ICAEW, holds a practising certificate in his own name, and is a former listed-company Finance Director with a BSc from Queen Mary College, University of London. He founded FD Capital in 2018 and has since built a network of five specialist recruitment practices. He leads every SMF Capital search personally. View Adrian’s ICAEW profile.
Need Compliance Leadership With Vulnerability Experience?
Tell us about your firm and your customers. We’ll find a compliance officer or conduct lead who has improved outcomes for vulnerable customers in your sector. We’ll come back to you the same working day.