Can One Person Hold More Than One SMF? Combining Senior Manager Roles

Can One Person Hold More Than One SMF? Combining Senior Manager Roles

At smaller and growing firms, one person often holds more than one Senior Manager Function. It can be efficient and entirely appropriate. But some combinations work well, some need safeguards, and some are the kind the regulators routinely question, usually because one role is meant to challenge the other. This page sets out the common combinations and how the FCA and PRA tend to view them.

The Basic Rules

There’s no general prohibition on one person holding several Senior Manager Functions. The regulators look at three things:

  • Time. Can the individual realistically discharge every function and every Prescribed Responsibility they hold?
  • Competence. Do they have the knowledge and experience for each function, not just one?
  • Independence and conflicts. Does combining the roles undermine challenge or create a conflict of interest?

Each function needs its own approval, and the individual’s Statement of Responsibilities must cover everything they’re accountable for. Under the Senior Managers and Certification Regime, adding a function to someone who is already approved needs a further approval application.

Common Combinations at a Glance

Combination Usual view Why
SMF16 Compliance + SMF17 MLRO Usually fine Very common at smaller firms; separated as firms grow
SMF2 Chief Finance + SMF24 Chief Operations Usually fine Common at smaller Enhanced firms; watch capacity
SMF1 Chief Executive + SMF3 Executive Director role Usually fine Typical at small firms
Same SMF at several group companies Usually fine Needs approval at each firm and enough time for each
Compliance officer + data protection officer Usually fine Not an SMF combination; check for conflicts
One non-executive chairing two committees With safeguards Possible at smaller firms; larger firms usually separate the audit and risk committee chairs
SMF4 Chief Risk + SMF16 Compliance With safeguards Possible at smaller firms, but both are second-line challenge roles and workload can be heavy
Chief executive + SMF16 Compliance Likely questioned Compliance oversight is meant to challenge the business
SMF1 Chief Executive + SMF9 Chair Likely questioned Separating chair and chief executive is a basic governance expectation
SMF2 Chief Finance + SMF4 Chief Risk Likely questioned, especially at larger firms The CRO should challenge financial risk-taking independently
SMF5 Internal Audit + any first or second-line role Likely questioned Internal audit must be independent of what it audits
MLRO + head of sales or a revenue-generating business Likely questioned Conflict between reporting suspicions and commercial targets

“Likely questioned” doesn’t mean prohibited. It means the firm should expect to explain the arrangement and the safeguards, and should consider whether separating the roles would be better.

The Combinations in More Detail

Compliance Officer and MLRO

The most common combination, and one the regulator generally accepts at smaller firms. The individual needs expertise in both compliance and financial crime, enough time, and cover for when they’re away. Our page on who can be your MLRO or compliance officer answers the related questions.

Chief Finance and Chief Operations

At smaller Enhanced firms, the finance director often runs operations too. It works where the individual has operational and technology experience as well as finance, and enough time. As operational resilience demands grow, many firms separate the roles. See chief operating officer recruitment.

Chief Risk Officer and Compliance

Both roles provide challenge, so combining them doesn’t create the obvious conflict that combining risk with a business role would. But the combined workload can be heavy, and the regulators may question whether one person can do both properly at a firm of any size. It’s more common at smaller investment firms than at banks or insurers. See chief risk officer recruitment.

Chief Executive and Chair

Separating the chair and the chief executive is one of the most basic governance expectations, reflected in the UK Corporate Governance Code. At very small firms, a founder may act as both, but as soon as a firm has a board of any substance, the regulators will expect an independent or non-executive chair. See chair and committee chair recruitment.

The question isn’t whether one person can hold two functions. It’s whether either function loses something by being combined with the other.

Committee Chairs

At smaller firms, one independent non-executive sometimes chairs both the audit and risk committees. At larger firms, and particularly dual-regulated firms, the regulators usually expect separate chairs, partly because each committee needs focused, expert leadership. Recruiting an additional independent non-executive is often the answer. NED Capital, a sister practice, specialises in non-executive appointments.

Internal Audit

The head of internal audit must be independent of the areas internal audit reviews. Combining SMF5 with a compliance, risk or business role undermines that independence and is very likely to be questioned.

Compliance Officer and Data Protection Officer

This isn’t an SMF combination, because the data protection officer isn’t a Senior Manager Function. It’s common at smaller firms. Data protection law requires the DPO not to have conflicting tasks, so check the combination with the ICO’s guidance in mind.

The Same Function Across Group Companies

One person can hold, for example, SMF16 at several regulated companies in a group, with approval at each. Each firm’s regulator will want to see that the individual has enough time and understands each firm’s business. See our article on group SMF roles.

Safeguards When Roles Are Combined

Safeguards checklist

  • A clear Statement of Responsibilities covering every function and Prescribed Responsibility
  • An honest assessment of time, reviewed at least annually
  • A deputy or cover arrangement for each function
  • Independent challenge, for example from a non-executive or external review
  • Management information covering each function separately
  • A plan to separate the roles if the firm grows or the workload increases
  • A record of why the board considered the combination appropriate
Scenario: separating roles as a firm grows

A boutique investment manager’s finance director also holds SMF24 and acts as head of risk. When the firm becomes Enhanced, the board reviews the arrangement. Keeping finance and operations together is fine, but the risk role now needs independence from finance. The firm recruits a chief risk officer to hold SMF4 and reporting directly to a newly appointed risk committee chair.

When Separating the Roles Makes Sense

  • The firm is growing quickly or moving from Core to Enhanced. See becoming an Enhanced firm.
  • One of the functions is under supervisory attention or remediation.
  • The individual’s time is clearly stretched.
  • One role is meant to challenge the other.
  • The regulator has asked about the arrangement.

Separating roles often means a new hire, and sometimes a fractional one is enough. The board should record its decision either way, so it can explain the reasoning if the regulator asks. Our governance and SMF structure review looks at how responsibilities are allocated across a firm’s Senior Managers.

Combining Senior Manager Roles

Services and guides for firms reviewing their SMF structure. Every SMF search is led personally by Adrian Lawrence FCA

Practice Area

Structure


How responsibilities are allocated.

→ Governance structure review
→ The Responsibilities Map


SMFs by firm tier →

Practice Area

Control Functions


Common combinations.

→ Compliance officer (SMF16)
→ MLRO (SMF17)


Who can be your MLRO? →

Practice Area

Executive Roles


Finance, risk and operations.

→ Chief Risk Officer (SMF4)
→ Chief Operating Officer (SMF24)


All SMF designations →

Practice Area

Board


Separating chair and committees.

→ Chair and committee chairs
→ SMF9 Chair


Tell us about your hire →


Every SMF search is led personally by Adrian Lawrence FCA

Frequently Asked Questions

Is there a limit on how many SMFs one person can hold?

No fixed limit. The regulators assess whether the person can realistically discharge each function.

Does each function need a separate approval?

Yes. Each Senior Manager Function needs approval, and adding a function to someone already approved needs a further application.

Can a fractional Senior Manager hold functions at several unrelated firms?

Yes, with approval at each firm and enough time for each. Many fractional compliance officers and MLROs do.

Will the regulator reject a combination outright?

Rarely outright. More often it will ask questions, and the firm will need to explain the safeguards or reconsider.

About the Author

Adrian Lawrence FCA is the founder of SMF Capital. He is a Chartered Accountant and Fellow of the ICAEW, holds a practising certificate in his own name, and is a former listed-company Finance Director with a BSc from Queen Mary College, University of London. He founded FD Capital in 2018 and has since built a network of five specialist recruitment practices. He leads every SMF Capital search personally, including appointments that separate combined Senior Manager roles as firms grow. View Adrian’s ICAEW profile.

Reviewing Who Holds Which SMF?

We can help you decide which roles to combine and which to separate, and recruit where a new Senior Manager is needed.